Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Light source for evaluating prints?

2007-01-29 by Robert Lee

I found a moderately priced Tensor desk lamp at an art supply store
that uses a 15 watt "6400K full spectrum" helical flourescent bulb.
One reason I got it was that I simply could not judge colors or toned
prints with my tungsten lighting, or (ironically) the flourescent
replacements that are designed to give tungsten-like light.

I don't know how well balanced the bulb is--I find it a bit on the
cold side--but it's good enough: I find I can judge color fairly well
under the lamp plus the ambient tungsten. It does take a minute to get
to full brightness, but there is no flicker as far as I can tell. One
unexpected benefit: reading text is much easier. (Makes sense, I
guess--full spectrum should give max contrast for a wide range of
text/ground combinations.)

Potential issues: I haven't found a source for replacement bulbs, and
there may not be enough light to judge a very large print as a whole.
The only solution I've come up with so far for either issue is to buy
another lamp.

Bob L

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark"
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> 
> >... there is no gallery standard ...
> 
> Does anyone know how far off the white (balanced) LED lights are?
> 
> Frankly, I don't want to invest much in lighting with today's hot
lights if
> we're close to an efficient lighting technology.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.