I found a moderately priced Tensor desk lamp at an art supply store that uses a 15 watt "6400K full spectrum" helical flourescent bulb. One reason I got it was that I simply could not judge colors or toned prints with my tungsten lighting, or (ironically) the flourescent replacements that are designed to give tungsten-like light. I don't know how well balanced the bulb is--I find it a bit on the cold side--but it's good enough: I find I can judge color fairly well under the lamp plus the ambient tungsten. It does take a minute to get to full brightness, but there is no flicker as far as I can tell. One unexpected benefit: reading text is much easier. (Makes sense, I guess--full spectrum should give max contrast for a wide range of text/ground combinations.) Potential issues: I haven't found a source for replacement bulbs, and there may not be enough light to judge a very large print as a whole. The only solution I've come up with so far for either issue is to buy another lamp. Bob L --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > > >... there is no gallery standard ... > > Does anyone know how far off the white (balanced) LED lights are? > > Frankly, I don't want to invest much in lighting with today's hot lights if > we're close to an efficient lighting technology. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-29 by Robert Lee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.