Digital BW, The Print

Finally, a voice of reason. You can, and I am some of you will, talk about
this til the cows come home. I view my prints in the studio which has
several lighting stations; daylight bulbs both tungsten and florescent,
tungsten track lighting, the hallway outside the studio which can offer open
shade and direct sun. To balance a print to a standard that NO ONE lives in,
or displays their prints in is crazy.  

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street

Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

http://e.neilsen.home.att.net

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

Skype ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djon43
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:52 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?

 

.

I think it's odd to standardize on 6000 or 6500 (unless you're a
lithographer) since there are literally no situations in normal life
that are lit that cold, most especially not galleries. 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]