In a message dated 1/30/07 2:01:37 PM, evogel@... writes: > -- Now that's a really interesting point. I find the whole uv brightener > thing annoying. But I never thought it through to the evaluation issue. I do > think it's ironic that uv brighteners are (often) added to paper and then we do > everything we can to keep uv away from the paper... > OBAs (optical brightening agents) are sometimes called UV brighteners, but in fact they brighten even when no UV is present, as they react to blue visible light as well. For B&W fine art printing, non-brightened papers generally suit the bill; but many color images end up on brightened papers as it gives the whole image more punch, and in the case of inkjet reproductions of paintings on canvas, the brightened whites better match the brightened whites found in some fine art media. So its hard to blame the canvas printer for choosing a brightened canvas, when the artists he prints for use brightened paints, and he needs to match those whites as effectively as possible. C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... www.colorvision.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.