In a message dated 1/30/07 2:03:13 PM, e.neilsen2@... writes: > Maybe we need new standards. > You may be a bit late, but please send your input to IPA Standards committee members David McDowell of Eastman Kodak <mcdowell@...>, and Larry Warter of Fuji Photo Film, USA <fujiwarter@...>. They are dealing with a draft of the ISO 3664, Viewing Conditions for Graphic Technology and Photography, which is currently set to institute new standards, ones that will set D50 as the viewing light standard. I can't imagine that you will change their minds, but your comments should be heard. Interestingly, it will also list D65 as the monitor standard. This D65 monitor thing is something Bruce Fraser and I started agitating for some years ago, that has really taken root since then. Its really a matter of ambient light level: D50 (5000k) was great for monitors in the CRT era, with prepress correctors in the dark, but D65 (6500K) is much more appropriate for brighter LCDs in moderate lighting. ColorVision published an appropriate process some time ago for converting the required D50 standard in ICC monitor profiles to a D65 monitor whitepoint in a way that would use the required transform and give reversable results, which has since become the standard for virtually all monitor calibration adjustment. So its now possible to use whatever whitepoint suits your ambient lighting level, or your paper white, if you want to get literal about it, and get good proofing results in a D50 light box. See link below for more info on ISO 3664: http://www.ipa.org/bulletin/articles/view_cond.php3 C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... www.colorvision.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Light source for evaluating prints?
2007-01-30 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.