Hello keith, >On your site, in Article 9 about printing with the R2400, in the >workflow section, you mention that you resize your file to 4" but >you do NOT resample. Why not resample? Because resampling changes the size of the file. I just want to make a small print from the existing file size. >I noticed that when you don't, the resolution goes up and the PPI >doesn't change. I'm not sure what you mean here. The Resolution, as shown in the Image Size window, _is_ PPI. If the print size is made smaller, the resolution (PPI) goes up and the file size remains unchanged. >If the output resolution is what determines the DPI of the print, >wouldn't that change the way the print looks by laying down more >ink? I'm a bit confused by your terminology, but I think I understand what you're getting at. First, I have read a variety of explanations on what happens when we do this. My understanding is that PS does do the resampling in a temporary file before sending to the printer. And of course it decides what algorithm to use. When _we_ resample we get to choose the algorithm. How important that is under various conditions is another subject, but I consider it irrelevent for these small initial proof prints. When it comes time to make final prints of varying sizes, the question arises as to whether we should make a 300dpi (resampled) file for each size print we wish to make. I think questions like this should be answered by each user's own experiments. There have been endless debates on how much the print quality is affected by this. I recommend making several sizes of a file, using various resampling algorithms (always leaving the master file intact), printing them at various sizes, and determining for yourself what is the best approach. That's the only way you'll be fully satisfied. Otherwise you'll just be believing one person's theory or another. For 4" initial proofs I don't think it matters. I hope this answers your questions. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: A couple of questions for Clayton Jones
2007-02-05 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.