In a message dated 3/3/07 9:40:41 AM, failedthespian@... writes: > Paul, Regarding you comments and dismissal of the Blue Wool Test, you > are out of step with virtually every major organisation involved with > testing colour materials for fading. > Materials; meaning fabrics and textiles. Thats the world the Blue Wool test is designed for. We are talking inkjet fading testing here, and for that Wilhelm or similar test methods are the standard. Even if you disagree, you will be find you are swimming against the current trying to get Blue Wool tests accepted for photo print longevity ESPECIALLY in the US. If your were convinced that metric offered the right units for sizing paper, but your customers insisted on purchasimg paper cut to standard sizes, would you lecture them on the superiority of metric, or would you provide the sizes they requested? You are hearing loud and clear that your customers don't want, don't trust, don't understand, and don't believe in, Blue Wool testing. Using it and insisting on it groups you, in user's perceptions, with the industry's con-artists, not its legitmate citizens. C. David Tobie Product Technology Manager ColorVision Business Unit Datacolor Inc. CDTobie@... www.colorvision.com ************************************** AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: New graduated black inks -Blue wool ratings
2007-03-05 by CDTobie@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.