Hello Mark, >Are you guys still pissing? It has been days. Actually I have found this thread to be very interesting and informative. The points of view still emerging from it continue to illuminate the issue for me, and I am also thinking of the many lurkers among our 8600 members, many of them new or relatively new, who may know nothing about the past history of the "ink wars". For example, C. David's last sentence... "Using it and insisting on it groups you, in user's perceptions, with the industry's con-artists, not its legitmate citizens." ...I believe is important because it openly states that there are con artists out there in the industry. Those of us who have been around for awhile know that to be true (beware of people offering "advance secrets" of new miracle technologies about to emerge). I think this thread will die down of it's own accord, and I don't have the sense that it's one of those out of control threads that can't end itself. My own feeling is that it has provided a valuable service. We all now have a background from which to watch how this new Dark Art ink emerges and fares in the marketplace. I would be delighted to see a new ink that produces better matte paper dmax, has greater longevity, doesn't clog and doesn't settle out. But I won't accept advertising hype and claims. I'll be watching for actual user reports. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
[Digital BW] Re: New graduated black inks -Blue wool ratings
2007-03-05 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.