I have some 6cm x 6cm b&w negatives exposed back in the early '60s on Tri X Pan Professional. They blew up to 20" x 16" quite successfully using a DeVere cold-cathode enlarger. Recently I had some of these negatives scanned by a bureau through an Imacon Flextight machine, but grain has become so pronounced that the scans are virtually unusable. I understand the problem. Light in a scanner is highly collimated - the light beams are nearly perfectly parallel. So the grains don't just block the light - they scatter it creating greater apparent density. The so-called "Callier Effect." And it will have been made worse because I neglected to tell the bureau *not* to sharpen the image! However I wondered what 'work-round' others in this group have tried to reduce grain on silver negatives. I have tried blurring the image lightly in Photoshop, followed by unsharp masking but am not very happy with the results. I have also read somewhere that some old-timers digitise their images via a conventional photographic print and a flat-bed scanner. By printing with a diffuse light source and a relatively soft grade of paper they suppress grain while capturing a tonal range that can be enhanced in Photoshop. Doubtless this works, but it does seem 'the long way round' and since it introduces an extra step in the process, image quality is bound to suffer. Of course I'm now running trials with the newer chromogenic films but that doesn't solve my problems with the archival images I still have. Any ideas on this theme would be most welcome!
Message
Excessive grain in scanned images
2002-01-26 by atmcintyre2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.