Digital BW, The Print

My sentiments also Clayton.

Regards
Duane



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
<cj@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Mark,
> 
> >Are you guys still pissing? It has been days.
> 
> Actually I have found this thread to be very interesting and
> informative.  The points of view still emerging from it continue to
> illuminate the issue for me, and I am also thinking of the many
> lurkers among our 8600 members, many of them new or relatively new,
> who may know nothing about the past history of the "ink wars".
> 
> For example, C. David's last sentence...
> 
> "Using it and insisting on it groups you, in user's perceptions, with
> the industry's con-artists, not its legitmate citizens."
> 
> ...I believe is important because it openly states that there are con
> artists out there in the industry.  Those of us who have been around
> for awhile know that to be true (beware of people offering "advance
> secrets" of new miracle technologies about to emerge).
> 
> I think this thread will die down of it's own accord, and I don't have
> the sense that it's one of those out of control threads that can't end
> itself.  My own feeling is that it has provided a valuable service.  
> 
> We all now have a background from which to watch how this new Dark Art
> ink emerges and fares in the marketplace.  I would be delighted to see
> a new ink that produces better matte paper dmax, has greater
> longevity, doesn't clog and doesn't settle out.  But I won't accept
> advertising hype and claims.  I'll be watching for actual user reports.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>