You would be better off having the negs rescanned from scratch, rather than trying to save them at this point. In the FlexColor software, a USM setting of -60, that's negative 60, in effect, is zero unsharp masking. Why, I don't know, but it is. Imacon recommends scanning negs at -60, and transparenicies at about 250, due to difference in the grain. I'd ask your scanner person to rescan them at -60 and then look at a sample. Personally, I'd scan negs at 100-150. If the grain is there, I'd rather it be sharp than murky. Nothing worse to me than an image with the grain not sharp. (Think of darkroom prints with the enlarger head out of alignment -- where the grain gets soft and mucky on the edges of the frame -- that's what I'm talking about). But it's your call. That's what I can offer. Mark Tucker
Message
Re: Excessive grain in scanned images
2002-01-26 by marktuckerdotcom
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.