-----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Manuel Toledo Quinones Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 12:12 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 8bit to 16 bit So, if my understanding is correct, 8-bit rgb = 256 levels x 3 channels = 768 levels (if converted to b&w) or the equivalent of 9.5 greyscale bits. Converting the 8-bit file to a 16-bit file produces 64k possible levels, which will be initially discretely distributed into 256 levels, i.e. each pixel color will have a value equal to 256*x, where x is the original 8-bit pixel value. So just after the conversion the information is the same in both the 8- and 16-bit files. The numbers are just bigger but you still have use 256 levels per color. However, after the conversion, you can adjust the pixel values more finely because you have the 64k levels. So processing the image in 16-bits should create less artifacts that doing so in 8-bits. The difference might be visible depending on how good your sight is and on the amount of processing. Right? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dealy663" <dealy663@...> wrote: > > A little bit of computer science here. > > An 8 bit BW file can have at most 256 levels of gray tones, a 16 bit > file can have 65536 independent tones. Converting from 8 to 16 bit > simply maps those original 256 tones into the 65536 space. If you had > a linear gradient going from black to white at the start it would > appear exactly the same after the conversion. You would still have 256 > independent tones. However you would also have room between each tone, > 256 blank spots with no gray vales on either side. By this I mean that > for the gray value that was originally 128 in the 8 bit file it would > now be 32768. The difference being that in the 8 bit file there were > picture elements represented by values 127 and 129. While in the 16 > bit file those values would be represented by 32512 and 330224, there > would be no pixels in the image with values between 32768 and these > other two numbers. > > Next lets say that you adjust the global contrast of your image. In a > simplified algorithm, an increase in contrast makes the values below > the midpoint (128 8-bit) darker and the values above the midpoint > lighter. In an 8 bit file if we subtract 1 from each value less than > 128 then we now have 126 tones where we had 127 tones before the > subtraction. This is because the pixels that were formerly at value 1 > are now at zero along with all the pixels that were previously at > zero. The same logic applies above the midpoint, so where we > originally had 256 tones before the contrast adjustment we now have > 254. In a 16 bit file applying the same type of correction still > leaves you with the original 256 independent tones, because there was > 256 bits of headroom between each original pixel value. You would have > to adjust the contrast by more than 255 points before you started > reducing the number of tones in your image. > > The scenario I've described above leads to the posterization that we > see when making large adjustments in 8-bit files. It is not true that > all image editing leads to the loss of data, but large movements > certainly can. There are other issues with 8 vs 16 bit related to > rounding errors also. > > With all that said, I rarely change my 8-bit files to 16-bit before > editing. I would only do so if there was something really wrong with > my exposure and I needed to make large adjustments to the file. > > Hope I didn't confuse the issue too much. > > Derek > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: 8bit to 16 bit
2007-04-11 by Gary W. Weaver
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.