Not to dwell on this forever, but while memory these days is cheap it's not dirt cheap. Whether to save your final versions as 8 bit vs. 16 bit files remains a good question. If you merely save your keeper original raw "negative" files, plus the keeper raw conversion files, plus one non-layered keeper final print file and possibly a back-up raw conversion-DNG file (not to mention any B&W conversion files), it doesn't take that long to fill a 500GB hard drive. Saving your final print as an 8 bit file does save some storage space and money. Does anyone think we will ever be able to tell the differnce visually between a good 8 bit color file print and a 16 bit color file print? --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Watson <bwyg@...> wrote: > > Tyler Boley wrote: > > If the over-riding concern is those better prints, why even bother > > taking the chance? > > Tyler > > > Exactly. Succinct as usual Tyler. > -- > Bruce Watson >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: 8bit to 16 bit
2007-04-13 by digikdm
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.