> From what I've heard, the PremierArt Fine Art Matte is the better paper. Paul Roark reported very good dmax with it. The Sparrowhawk can produce a slightly speckled or uneven appearance in large areas of black - but this is seldom a problem. Just with a low-key portrait with a black background did I have the problem. I just got a box of the Premier Art Matte BW paper and am not quite so impressed with it. The paper is bright white and 2 sided, but it has some curl, and isn't packaged all that well so the ends and corners aren't flat. Curled paper is definitely an issue with the 3800. The paper has a decent dmax of about 1.66 on my PFP spectro, but its main problem is what appears to be excessive dot gain. I've been fooling around with paper settings and ink density modifications and finally settled on Ultrasmooth Fine Art as the media setting. Unfortunately this is not what I wanted to do because the Epson print driver is so freakin' lame that it forces you to use the rear manual feeder on this setting. I was also going to give sparrowhawk paper a try, but after hearing about speckling I'm not so sure if I will. The others to consider are Moab Kayenta and Red River Polar Matte. I tried Kayenta a few years ago and it had poor quality control characteristics (flaking and shiny speckles). I hear that it is a better paper now so may try it. I've heard that Polar Matte is good, but only being single sided makes its cost around $0.50 per full sheet print, whereas with the 2 sided papers you get to flip the sheet for testing and proofs.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson Enhanced Matte Paper vs Heavyweight Paper
2007-04-14 by dealy663
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.