Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] From scan to print

2007-04-22 by Eric Neilsen Photo

My experience with XP2 and T400CN go back a few years. At the time, the
T400CN gave me a much smoother scan than the XP2. The scans were done with
an Imacon Precision II. The XP2 while MUCH sharper was a lot grainer. While
several years have passed, I am thank goodness no longer dealing with silver
printing of T400CN, I have yet to go back and test these films side by side.
I do have some XP2 that will be getting the chance to be included in the
slow and arduous process of pulling the film archive into the digital age,
if for nothing else for the web. The best advances to film scanning have
been the tremendous availablility of good noise filters.  

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

 

Skype : ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary W.
Weaver
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 8:20 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] From scan to print

 

Hi Harry,

Depending on what's going on - on the film, I scan grayscale or RGB.
Sometimes CYMK, if I get a different look.

I shoot FP4+ and APX100 because the processors around here suck. I haven't
played with XP2.

gar





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.