My experience with XP2 and T400CN go back a few years. At the time, the T400CN gave me a much smoother scan than the XP2. The scans were done with an Imacon Precision II. The XP2 while MUCH sharper was a lot grainer. While several years have passed, I am thank goodness no longer dealing with silver printing of T400CN, I have yet to go back and test these films side by side. I do have some XP2 that will be getting the chance to be included in the slow and arduous process of pulling the film archive into the digital age, if for nothing else for the web. The best advances to film scanning have been the tremendous availablility of good noise filters. Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 214-827-8301 http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype : ejprinter _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gary W. Weaver Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 8:20 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Digital BW] From scan to print Hi Harry, Depending on what's going on - on the film, I scan grayscale or RGB. Sometimes CYMK, if I get a different look. I shoot FP4+ and APX100 because the processors around here suck. I haven't played with XP2. gar [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] From scan to print
2007-04-22 by Eric Neilsen Photo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.