Hello Michele, >I am pretty new to digital BW printing so it might appear a silly >question but I wonder what are, generally speaking, the differences >between using a RIP (QTR for example) and the ABW of Epson printers. The ABW mode is sort of a rudimentary built in RIP, only in the sense that it blends the color inks to emulate BW tones. Real RIPS do that and much more, giving a huge amount of control beyond what ABW offers. Whether you want/need that extra control is another matter. ABW can produce very fine BW prints as is (article #9 at the link below outlines a very good and simple ABW workflow). But if, for example, you wanted to eliminate all Y and do the toning with only LC and LM, then you'd need a RIP to control each ink. Using a RIP involves a learning curve and more time and effort, so like everything, there's a trade off. Nice thing about the K3 printers is you can start with ABW and move into a RIP later if you feel the need. There's no need to decide before you buy the printer. >Then, and more specifically, I am interested in knowing if it is >worth going for a RIP or laying on the ABW of the Epson R3800. I >Will be printing BW both on matte and semi-glossy papers. Beyond using a RIP or not, there are advantages to using K3 inks, especially with the semi-glossy papers. So the 3800 would be a good investment with or without a RIP. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: RIP vs ABW
2007-05-03 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.