Digital BW, The Print

Thanks Clayton just read your articles... they're really well written
and useful :-)

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones"
<cj@...> wrote:
>
> Hello Michele,
> 
> >I am pretty new to digital BW printing so it might appear a silly
> >question but I wonder what are, generally speaking, the differences
> >between using a RIP (QTR for example) and the ABW of Epson printers. 
> 
> The ABW mode is sort of a rudimentary built in RIP, only in the sense
> that it blends the color inks to emulate BW tones.  Real RIPS do that
> and much more, giving a huge amount of control beyond what ABW offers.
> Whether you want/need that extra control is another matter.
> 
> ABW can produce very fine BW prints as is (article #9 at the link
> below outlines a very good and simple ABW workflow).  But if, for
> example, you wanted to eliminate all Y and do the toning with only LC
> and LM, then you'd need a RIP to control each ink.  Using a RIP
> involves a learning curve and more time and effort, so like
> everything, there's a trade off.  
> 
> Nice thing about the K3 printers is you can start with ABW and move
> into a RIP later if you feel the need.  There's no need to decide
> before you buy the printer.
> 
>  
> >Then, and more specifically, I am interested in knowing if it is
> >worth going for a RIP or laying on the ABW of the Epson R3800. I 
> >Will be printing BW both on matte and semi-glossy papers.
> 
> Beyond using a RIP or not, there are advantages to using K3 inks,
> especially with the semi-glossy papers.  So the 3800 would be a good
> investment with or without a RIP.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Clayton
> 
> 
> Info on black and white digital printing at    
> http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
>