On the contrary, Sam, it was exactly the kind of advice I sought. Harry On 5/21/07 12:18 PM, "Sam McCandless" <samcc@...> wrote: > > > > > On May 21, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Harry Lockwood wrote: > >> > [snip] >> > >> > PS For this group, which is preferred, top or bottom posting? > > As far as I know, Harry, it's up to us. You'll see some of each, and > both. > > When, as here, both what's not snipped away and my response to it > might fit on even a relatively small screen w/o scrolling, I often > add my response below what's not snipped. > > Otherwise, I usually add my response above what is not snipped away, > but even then try to be conscientious about snipping as much as > possible w/o making my response difficult to understand for lack of > context. > > Editing the subject line as necessary or desirable is, I think, also > important. Both that and snipping make dealing with the posts a lot > easier for subscribers who get the posts in batches. > > Please excuse the unasked-for advice, which I expect you don't need > but I couldn't resist. > -- > Sam > -- Harry F. Lockwood [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: top vs. bottom replies (was Re: [Digital BW] Re: Black & White Scanning)
2007-05-21 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.