Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Black and White landscape exhibit

2007-05-29 by Tyler Boley

Alan, tell you what- rather than get into this conversation yet again,
I'll simply retract the statement. Pass it off as a silliness coming
from someone tired, brain dead, and working on a national holiday.
As someone who drives an 11 year old Saturn complete with bird
droppings and a smelly dog blanket, the point is moot.
I bow to the new technology, the vested interests, the marketing
geniuses. I love them, I know they love me.

Digital capture is Super Duper! (Young Frankenstein fans will know how
that's supposed to be spoken).

Obviously no blanket statements can be made. More coffee.
Tyler


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "alan9990_6"
<aansell@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler,
> 
> I find that an interesting comment coming from someone obviously able
> to make the comparison. Are you able to provide links to any images
> that might allow a direct visual comparison between very high end
> digital and a piece of fim? That would say more than many words.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> > The idea of spending $35,000.00 on a capture system that still can't
> touch a $2 sheet of film 
> > is so stupifyingly absurd I can't even begin considering it.
> > Tyler
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.