I thought I would throw in my pennys worth on the subject of the minolta
Pro. I print with Piezo inks. I scan all B&W 6x7 negs in colour slide mode
with 4 times oversampling. I do no adjustments in with the minolta sofware
and leave all that to photoshop. I then invert and have to convert to
greyscale in order to export to the Piezo software. I have been getting
truely lovely tonality and incredible depth of detail. No doubt Frank has a
more informed and professional eye than mine but I am very happy with the
results and they are an improvement on my Wet processed prints.
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Victor Landweber [mailto:victor@...]
Sent: 28 January 2002 23:43
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Minolta Pro Vs Nikon 8000: Grain vs Softness
Frank --
I will be very interested in hearing about your Polaroid 120 experience.
Will your prior disappointment with the Minolta and Silverfast keep you
from trying Silverfast with the Polaroid? I have a low opinion of
Polaroid's alternative software -- Polacolor Insight.
Thank you for persevering with your thorough medium-format scanner search.
-- Victor Landweber
At 09:28 PM 1/28/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>Earlier in this post I said that I scanned the same color negs on
>a Nikon and on a Minolta Pro. I will now scan those same negs
>on a Polaroid 120. I'll get them to my friend this week so I can
>add a more informed opinion to our options.
>
> After working with my Minolta for 3 months, trying Silverfast HDR
>(much too much grain) as well as the Minolta software, I am
>dissatisfied and cannot recommend the product for any negative
>scanning. The problem is squarely placed on the grain aliasing.
>There are other problems such as the highlights blow out very
>quickly, but I would be happy to simply get an answer for the
>graininess.
>
>I have scanned b&w and color negs as slides, negs (both b/w
>and color) and as 16 bit linear files. I have oversampled 16
>times, added Gem, Ice and Roc, added gaussian blur and used
>the smudge tool. I have tried the workarounds that have been
>offered on this list. I have not tried Neatscan (or whatever)
>because I have a Mac. I have also not tried VueScan.
>
>I will say that the negative carriers and the software is a pleasure
>to work with. Ergonomically, this machine is great. The problem
>is in the results from negatives. Slides look great.
>
>I am considering selling the Minolta Pro. If anyone out there
>wants it, I will send it to Minolta warranty service, first , so they
>can completely go through it , and then send it off to you. I will do
>this for $300 less than what any Minolta Pro is selling for on the
>web.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.314 / Virus Database: 175 - Release Date: 11/01/02
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Minolta Pro Vs Nikon 8000: Grain vs Softness
2002-01-29 by Mahesi Caplan-Faust
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.