Yes thank you Richard Brooklyn I was not aware of this option. I agree being able to soft proof the grey profiles that Image print offers is a considerable advantage. My experience has taught me that you either rely on our eyes or you rely on the numbers, there are no other options. Ideally we should be able to rely on our eyes, but there are so many obstacles between what we see on the screen and the proof we produce from the file data . At one point, (perhaps this is the "dark ages" that Amadou refers to), I attempted to follow and understand the chain of cryptic algorithms that compress the data through the work flow to the final print, only to discover that the vast majority of them are so surreptitious that it is almost inconceivable to draw a direct correlation between data and density unless you unplug the color management system and fly the plane yourself. Recently I have dedicated time and energy to correlating data and density in order to master this relationship. So far my best results are achieved by returning to the stone age techniques of drawing direct correlations between L* values as they are displayed in the greyscale workspace and densities as they are measured by a densitometer. For example everyone knows that L*50 should produce 18% reflective density but it never does. For me this is an interesting question , why doesn't it? If I print a monochrome patch of L*50 from a greyscale space which will be converted to a custom profile via relative rendering I should produce 18% grey. But I don't, I never do. The problem is compounded when I try to maintain the precise resonance of shadow tones that I perceive on the screen between say, L*4 and L*2 ( both of which are fictitious values that niether the printer nor the monitor can reproduce) but which BPC and what ever other linearization algorithms might transpose between the file data and the printer profile conversion. So, here's the thing, After trying to learn how to fly the Boeing 747 using auto pilot, I am now interested in finding out how to fly a spit-fire manually and I am wondering if anyone has any idea about reference material that could help me. Eugene Appert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] book
2007-06-01 by eappert
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.