I must say that I would do it the other way around, 2400 for colour (and ABW B&W) and 1800 for dedicated B&W. In the 1800, with its 8 cartridges, you could use Paul Roark's latest 3K Eboni workflow as well as a full set of UT-3D inks giving you a variety of B&W choices for both matt and glossy. Alternatively you could use one of the Cone K7 inksets in the 1800. With this approach you would have lots of B&W options with the only downside being the loss of gloss optimiser for your glossy colour prints. David Whistance -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of FRD Sent: 11 June 2007 18:13 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Two printer workflow: R1800 & R2400 > > ³In my opinion, I would them as you have listed. The 1800 is the > same as the 800 and I found it to be pretty poor for BW. I sold my > 800 to a guy that prints nothing but color in it and he loves it. I > print my BW on my 2400 with ABW and am very happy with it.² > > keith > > Thank you. Since I would be dedicating the 2400 as a BW machine, it would seem somewhat limiting to use it in ABW mode...Should I explore QTR with UT-3D inkset or just replace the yellow cart as per Paul¹s recommendations... Any and all advice is very much appreciated. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Two printer workflow: R1800 & R2400
2007-06-11 by David Whistance
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.