Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] From the horses mouth.

2002-01-29 by Austin Franklin

> Hi Austin, have you ever used the SI software that was posted on the
> list about 2 weeks ago?

Hi Jerry,

My scanner is high enough resolution, and I don't print over 20x24 digitally
anyway...so I haven't had the need to use any of those.

> In comparison with Genuine Fractals and Adobe
> bicubic upsampling, it gave sharper, more detailed results than either
> Genuine Fractals or Photoshop Bicubic. I tried it on several images, and
> it is better. Again, not by much, but enough to make it the upsizer of
> choice. I'll send you a copy if you'd like to try it.

Sure.

> It is an action
> that upsamples the image many times in small increments. Hard to believe
> that could work, but it does. I always upsample my D-30 images to 36
> Megs or so for final use, then sharpen as much as I can, and then reduce
> that image if I ever need a smaller one.

I believe that upsampling can get smarter and possibly "simulate"
detail...but in the end, just like a Pixar movie, or Super Nintendo
game...it's still not really real ;-)

> Regardless of the numbers say, the D-30 is capable of some very nice
> images up to 12x18 inches.

I know, and I've never said otherwise.

> And I'm very picky as you know, but probably
> not as picky as you are.

Oh, I don't know about that ;-)

> And I also am willing to bet you have better
> eyesight than I do. It is rare to find someone who is that picky. That's
> a good thing, right?

Well, I really wouldn't call it picky, in my case.  It's just I know how
this stuff works...it's kind of like finding out there is no "fictional
character of your choice"...

> Canon is releasing a 6 megapixel camera soon, that
> has a full size chip. a 17 mm lens will still be a 17mm lens. Wonder
> what THAT is going to cost?

One of the issues I have with getting that type of digital camera now, is
none of them use any of the lenses I already have tens of thousands of
dollars invested in!  It'll probably be 5 or more years before I get a
traditional "35mm" SLR digital camera, and it'll probably be the
Contax...used, as well as wait for more lenses to come out.  I know I will
eventually get one, it's just a matter of time.  I'm in no hurry to stop
using my film based 35mm, and I shoot mostly B&W anyway, except P&S with my
little Contax TVS.

I shoot WIDE open most of the time, and really need FAST lenses and manual
focus.  I don't believe any autofocus can reliably give me what I want when
shooting with a 1/4" DOF.  Most of the digital (and autofocus) cameras have
slow lenses...probably for increased DOF purposes...

Regards,

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.