> Hi Austin, have you ever used the SI software that was posted on the > list about 2 weeks ago? Hi Jerry, My scanner is high enough resolution, and I don't print over 20x24 digitally anyway...so I haven't had the need to use any of those. > In comparison with Genuine Fractals and Adobe > bicubic upsampling, it gave sharper, more detailed results than either > Genuine Fractals or Photoshop Bicubic. I tried it on several images, and > it is better. Again, not by much, but enough to make it the upsizer of > choice. I'll send you a copy if you'd like to try it. Sure. > It is an action > that upsamples the image many times in small increments. Hard to believe > that could work, but it does. I always upsample my D-30 images to 36 > Megs or so for final use, then sharpen as much as I can, and then reduce > that image if I ever need a smaller one. I believe that upsampling can get smarter and possibly "simulate" detail...but in the end, just like a Pixar movie, or Super Nintendo game...it's still not really real ;-) > Regardless of the numbers say, the D-30 is capable of some very nice > images up to 12x18 inches. I know, and I've never said otherwise. > And I'm very picky as you know, but probably > not as picky as you are. Oh, I don't know about that ;-) > And I also am willing to bet you have better > eyesight than I do. It is rare to find someone who is that picky. That's > a good thing, right? Well, I really wouldn't call it picky, in my case. It's just I know how this stuff works...it's kind of like finding out there is no "fictional character of your choice"... > Canon is releasing a 6 megapixel camera soon, that > has a full size chip. a 17 mm lens will still be a 17mm lens. Wonder > what THAT is going to cost? One of the issues I have with getting that type of digital camera now, is none of them use any of the lenses I already have tens of thousands of dollars invested in! It'll probably be 5 or more years before I get a traditional "35mm" SLR digital camera, and it'll probably be the Contax...used, as well as wait for more lenses to come out. I know I will eventually get one, it's just a matter of time. I'm in no hurry to stop using my film based 35mm, and I shoot mostly B&W anyway, except P&S with my little Contax TVS. I shoot WIDE open most of the time, and really need FAST lenses and manual focus. I don't believe any autofocus can reliably give me what I want when shooting with a 1/4" DOF. Most of the digital (and autofocus) cameras have slow lenses...probably for increased DOF purposes... Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] From the horses mouth.
2002-01-29 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.