Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] All you scanning pros: Great scanner for 4x5 negs?

2007-07-11 by Bill Morse

Hi Mark-

Ha! No doubt. However, after years of trying to do fine-art scanning with
both a scitex and a Nikon 9000, and after directly comparing scans of the
same high-quality neg on both an Imacon and a drum (Howtek 6500 in my case),
I know the statement to be factual. On the other hand, as I also pointed
out, not all uses require that level of quality, expertise, and effort.

As an aside, it continues to amaze me that people who spend the time, effort
and $$ to do large format photography then content themselves with flatbed
scans.

Bill

On 7/11/07, Mark Savoia <mark@...> wrote:
>
>   Bill,
> You are going to piss off lots of people with that statement, careful.
> Mark
>
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Bill Morse wrote:
>
> > As others have said, drum scanning is absolutely the best way to
> > go; any of
> > the flatbed and Imacon scanners will have significantly more noise,
> > flare,
> > and will be less sharp across the film plane than a good drum scan.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>



-- 
Regards,

Bill Morse
Wm. Morse Editions

(617) 429-3298


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.