Hi Mark- Ha! No doubt. However, after years of trying to do fine-art scanning with both a scitex and a Nikon 9000, and after directly comparing scans of the same high-quality neg on both an Imacon and a drum (Howtek 6500 in my case), I know the statement to be factual. On the other hand, as I also pointed out, not all uses require that level of quality, expertise, and effort. As an aside, it continues to amaze me that people who spend the time, effort and $$ to do large format photography then content themselves with flatbed scans. Bill On 7/11/07, Mark Savoia <mark@...> wrote: > > Bill, > You are going to piss off lots of people with that statement, careful. > Mark > > On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Bill Morse wrote: > > > As others have said, drum scanning is absolutely the best way to > > go; any of > > the flatbed and Imacon scanners will have significantly more noise, > > flare, > > and will be less sharp across the film plane than a good drum scan. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > -- Regards, Bill Morse Wm. Morse Editions (617) 429-3298 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] All you scanning pros: Great scanner for 4x5 negs?
2007-07-11 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.