I don't have that grainy issue with my 2200 @ 1440 but I do find 2880 frequently over-inking ...does that suggest something about my settings/curves? ...I don't find LLK carts (UT 3D) for 2200 on the MIS site...just bulk...is LLK now available as a cart or must I commit and fill my own? ..if LLK was used in the LK position in an otherwise all UT-7 inkset, what would I likely have to do to adjust? ...are the OTHER inks in UT3D the same as UT-7 inks ? John --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote: > > >... I am finding smoothness is indeed an issue with the > >QTR/Epson UC combo. If I use 1440, images look a little > >on the grainy side ... > > >When I use 2880 things get darker and grittier and > >shadows over-ink to the point of the rollers picking > >up ink before it can dry... > > There are reasons I put the LLK in my 2200 setup. It will take care of the > smoothness issues and probably help the banding issue. Other problems you > mention could be profile problems. > > > I am using the PK cartridge and Ilford Smooth Pearl ... > > I like the feel and look of this paper but maybe I > > need to go back to matt for BW. > > The 4K inkset I describe at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/4K+.pdf can > print both matte and glossy without ink changes, as can the UT-3D, described > at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/UT-3D_Readme.pdf. Some profiles are > posted for the 3D inkset. That one can also be profiled, at least for > neutral matte prints, with the ColorVision PFP software. > > >Judging by your comments I should be able to get acceptable > >results from the QTR/EPson UC combo so I would like to persist > >until I am getting the best out of this combo. > > I'd stick with 2880 and make your own profiles with QTR. Try running a > calibration print (with slider at 100) and setting the default ink limit at > the point that gives the best damx. Leave the ink limit box for the LK > blank. Fill in the density box in the usual manner. Do this for both the > PK and MK -- in different profiles. If you see blotchiness in the midtones, > then the LK limit will need to be lowered. Whether you'll be able to avoid > the banding with the 2200 may depend on the individual printer and how well > made it is. You might be able to reduce banding by having more ink overlap, > but do this via manually pulling the black curves out further, with no LK > going into the 100% black end. You can convert the curves into a list of > points by just noting the coordinates at the curve generated when you push > the Create Curve button on the Curve Creator. Look for bulges in a curve > due to the smoothing algorithm. You may need to pin down the K curve with a > series of points at 0. For the best glossy dmax, try putting some full > strength cyan in at 100% and the deep shadows. > > Good luck. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] BW Ink options for a 2200
2007-07-15 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.