Digital BW, The Print

> I recently returned from a trip to the Antarctic with a bunch of
> photographers including John Shaw of nature photography fame.  He has got
> into digital imaging quite extensively and told us something which I found
> very interesting.  By upsizing in increments of 10% there is no loss of
> identifiable definition.

I have no problem with upsizing not losing definition...but it can't create
detail where no detail was captured in the original image...  I think a lot
of the problem is understanding what interpolation (upsizing) actually does
an doesn't do.

Austin