Amadou, Thanks for your thoughtful reply. (And for your great book!) I followed your link to that blog and its link to an Adobe article and learned some things. For now, I've decided to tweak what I have and use Memory Stick and the efficiency measurement within Photoshop to decide whether I should increase my memory from 2GB to 4. FYI, I usually can find things to do while Photoshop grinds away at an action involving many files - fixing a snack, checking email, ... It's the small chunks of time while working on a big file with many layers I'm trying to miimize; the seconds waiting for a filter to complete or a dodge/burn to show up in final form, for example, because these add up and there's nothing I can do but wait for completion. Not contesting that you find a speed improvement with your new setup, but I'll keep those Macworld articles I saved and wait on a new Mac until I see an article showing a more significant improvement over what I have. Thanks again, Michael --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "amadou diallo" <amadiallo@...> wrote: > > Very few apps can utilize 8 processors simultaneously, and they are > largely video editinging/production tools. > See his blog post by John Nack for more info > <http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2006/12/photoshop_and_multicore.html> > Even if PS doesn't utilize all available processors that doens't mean > there's no benefit to say, a 2x dual core setup. You have "spare" > processors to devote to other apps and the OS while PS is crunching > away. But video pros aside, the 8 core machines seem to be more for > geek status than real world performance gains. > When I switched to CS3 I moved to a Mac Pro 2x 2.66 dual core from a > dual G5 2.5. On the Mac Pro, PS launches faster and progress bars feel > shorter. A noticeable difference? Yes, but not night and day. And of > course for optimum performance you need to feed the beast with > adequate RAM, use fast drives, create RAID scratch disks, etc etc. So > the cost of upgrading goes far beyond the Mac Pro purchase. Oh, and on > top of that you get to track down (and pay) for upgrades for your > other heavy use apps that must now be Universal Binary to run at full > speed. > Having said all of that, I don't regret the move, and everything feels > fast, but there are definitely other ways to spend your money that are > more photographically fulfilling. > -- > amadou diallo > Author, Mastering Digital Black and White > www.masteringdigitalbwbook.com >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Photoshop Faster On New Macs?
2007-08-09 by michaelrosensf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.