Digital BW, The Print

"jnhugo" <jnhugo@...> wrote:

Please note: JN Hugo mistakenly attributed Richard Massie's comment
(below) to me: I had disagreed: Professional copy skills CAN READILY
equal or "improve" originals well enough to fool demanding people. I
didn't say "perfectly match."  

Excellent fraudulent copies would be easy for a traditionally skilled
technician (such as many of us here), depending on the forensic
expertise of the buyer.

 "Experienced in studio photography" doesn't suggest a person is
competent at copy work, just as "competent at copy work" doesn't
suggest good Senior Portraits.

John Kelly

> > > So are you saying that with your skills you could produce a copy
> > that would  be the same, or as good as the original?
> > > I don't think so, and I am also very experienced in studio  
> photography.
> > >  
> > > Richard Massie