Anyone who has ever worked with watercolors, even the finest ones such as Windor Newton, knows that you can look at the pigments floating around in suspension right there on the paper itself. That fairly coarse clumping of pigments is actually the substance and beauty of the medium. Hardly the kind of grinding that one would need to pass through an Epson micro piezzo head for photogaphic smooth value purposes. That is apples and oranges compared there. What started this line of the thread was me saying that carbon pigment in conjunction with micro grinding AND all the other components of an inkjet formulation is a different animal than carbon pigment in a natural form, pure carbon. If this were not true there would be no need to fade test these monochrome inkjet prints at all to determine whether they were >200, >300, etc. They would last into the thousands of years, or at least until the paper fell apart. john
Message
[Digital BW] Re: K3 archival and alternatives
2007-08-21 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.