"some people are crazy enought to pay 30 grand for a type c Kodak lightjet print as an investment, seriously. That's their bad judgement, not mine. But what is within my control matters to me." If you actually took this issue as seriously as you claim, you'd recognize that your "control" of "archival" consists primarily of preservation of digital files for clients' optional future access, so that over the millenia your timeless wonderful images can be reprinted again and again by your progeny, cursed with the responsibility unto the seventh generation. If they care, patrons of today's Picassos know their paintings will not last forever without restoration. The same sort of knowledge should, for photographers to sleep well, be conveyed to purchasers of inkjet prints. To pretend the original print is "archival" while not offering future reprints from digital files (for a price by whoever is alive to make the prints ) might be seen as deceitful, a morally careless attitude toward the work itself (which is the file) as it wings its way into the misty future. There are, after all, services that promise eternal storage of digital files (so long as the bills are paid :-)
Message
Re: K3 archival and alternatives
2007-08-22 by john kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.