john dean wrote: > Ernst, > > There is this debate going on that when the Z driver adds the PK ink > to the MK rag paper output (quad as apposed to Tri black) that you're > not really gaining anything, and could possibly even create a very > difficult mix to linearize, given the unequally spaced density > dilution of the Pk ink in a Quad set up like that. > > What is your take on that having worked with it? I assume a carefuly > controled mono rip could take more advantage if it better than the HP > driver? Is the additon of the extra PK black doing anything for you vs > not using it on media such as say Photorag? > > john I think I raised that question myself. But right now the Fine Art Paper >250 gr media setting that uses the quad inkset gives a higher Dmax than the Matte Litho Realistic media setting that leaves PK out of the mix, both used on all matt HM coatings. The PK may not do much in bridging the gap between middle grey ink and MK (which was what made me question its use) but it could boost the Dmax by running along on the last part with MK. As long as the curves are hidden in the Z3100 driver it is hard to find out. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] glossy bw with a Canon iPF5100 using trueBW
2007-08-29 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.