Digital BW, The Print

Should we not avoid using the term 'Pure Carbon' for pigment inks, since it 
isn't. The first line in Paul's article is clearer - calling them '100% 
carbon pigment (no color inks)'. The qualification is important in making it 
clear what is 100% (not the carbon, but the pigment). A hyphen between 
carbon and pigment would be even better IMO.

You wouldn't want to mislead your customers, would you?

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "chriskjezp" <chriskresser@...>
To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 9:47 PM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: R1800 "pure carbon" approach?


I have since found and read Paul Roark's excellent article describing
the "pure carbon" approach in full detail.