>... >Also, having just read Clayton's post in which he explains >why he's sticking with the 2400 for now, he mentions clogging, I've had both and find no 2400 advantage here. > leaking poppet valves (??), MIS uses the same carts for both. > resetting chips, refilling carts Same if you use MIS. The difference may be Epson OEM v. MIS. There, of course, one is looking at a major price difference. >and the extra software layer (QTR) as disadvantages (for him, at least) All else being equal, I'd like to print from Photoshop with a standard driver also. The Epson driver is also faster. But QTR gives me the controls I need to get the results I like -- on lots of different printers. So, I'm a major fan of QTR. I think it is easy to learn and worth learning for those who like to get involved at that level -- which is definitely not everyone. >I assume the clogging, leaking poppet valves, resetting chips >and refilling carts refer to the possible issues that arise >using MIS bulk inks and carts? I think it must be. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: R1800 "pure carbon" approach?
2007-08-30 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.