Paul, Thanks for your reply. > http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Pigment-dispersion.jpg That diagram looks just like the Cab-O-Jet 300 black pigment as described in http://nanoparticles.org/pdf/Kowalski.pdf ! ;) I found the introductory bit of the following article interesting (about manufacture and properties of carbon blacks) - http://carbon-black.org/carbonblackuserguide.pdf, especially the bit about size and aggregates and conglomerates. > (Epson calls the edge treatment of its MK a "solubility" treatment -- > which > makes no sense for a pigment.) Well, the borderline between 'soluble' and 'insoluble' is a bit gray, isn't it? Adding hydrophilic groups of various sorts makes the carbon black particles 'self-dispersing' in aqueous solution, by enabling hydrogen bonding with the water. So for most people, making the particles 'more soluble' is probably OK if not technically accurate. I still haven't understood why smaller particles of carbon black are apparently blacker than larger particles. Good for us that they are, but I'd like to understand why. Bob Frost. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...>
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: R1800 "pure carbon" approach?
2007-08-30 by Bob Frost
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.