Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: R1800 "pure carbon" approach?

2007-08-31 by chriskjezp

> Honestly, Chris, I think reviewing what you've said your needs and 
> interests are, you're better off with a 2400, they are better machines 
> from the start. As for the longevity issue, Wilhelm gives K3 ABW 
> printing well over 100 years, depending on the paper. And ABW is SO 
> much easier, and works well enough that you need to ask yourself: what 
> do I want to do, take and print photos, or mess with the equipment.
> 
> Steve Karafyllakis
> 

Steve,

Thanks for your suggestion.  I keep going back and forth on this, but
certainly based on what you've said the 2400 does sound more
appealing.  I definitely do not want to spend all of my time messing
with defective equipment, and frankly I'm not sure I have the
expertise to even diagnose some of the problems being reported here. 
Of course that might also mean that I won't even notice them, but
obviously something like clogging would be hard to miss.

When it comes down to it, if I include the cost of 3 MK ink cartridges
and QTR, there's only a $75 price difference between an 2400 and 1800.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.