> Honestly, Chris, I think reviewing what you've said your needs and > interests are, you're better off with a 2400, they are better machines > from the start. As for the longevity issue, Wilhelm gives K3 ABW > printing well over 100 years, depending on the paper. And ABW is SO > much easier, and works well enough that you need to ask yourself: what > do I want to do, take and print photos, or mess with the equipment. > > Steve Karafyllakis > Steve, Thanks for your suggestion. I keep going back and forth on this, but certainly based on what you've said the 2400 does sound more appealing. I definitely do not want to spend all of my time messing with defective equipment, and frankly I'm not sure I have the expertise to even diagnose some of the problems being reported here. Of course that might also mean that I won't even notice them, but obviously something like clogging would be hard to miss. When it comes down to it, if I include the cost of 3 MK ink cartridges and QTR, there's only a $75 price difference between an 2400 and 1800.
Message
Re: R1800 "pure carbon" approach?
2007-08-31 by chriskjezp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.