IMHO pixel count isn't the only factor, especially for larger prints. The viewing distance should also be considered when figuring out what scanning resolution to use. Picture Window Pro shipped (this is from 2002) with a scanning resolution calculator that combined negative size, printer resolution, viewing distance, and output width to calculate needed scanning resolution. For example; for a 35mm negative, 13inches x 19inches output (to give you some cropping room on an 11" x 17" print), printer resolution of 1440 dpi, and a viewing distance of 10" (rather close), the recommended scanning resolution is a little over 3400 dpi. If you change the viewing distance to 24 inches, the needed resolution drops to 1433 dpi. (but that wouldn't look real great on closer examination). Going the other way, at a viewing distance of 6" the recommended resolution is over 5600 dpi. So it depends on how you expect to view the prints -- get you face right into them or put them on the wall and step back. Personally, I'd say that anything 3200 dpi or greater would be OK. But there's also the file format to consider -- 16 bit TIFF would be nice presuming your photo editing software can make use of it. Back to lurking, Steve Alred Upper Marlboro, MD --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "steveh0607" <steveh060758@...> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I found and old Pentax Super Program film camera that still works like new (how about that > for quality construction)!! I had it cleaned then shot a roll of Delta 100. The largest paper I > print on is 11"x17" with the image no more than 15" on the long side (Epson 2400), but most > prints are on 8.5"x11" paper. > > The local photo store develops and scans negatives to a disc. At what resolution should I > have the negatives scanned to ensure a good inkjet print? > > Thanks, Steve >
Message
Re: Scanning 35mm Ilford Delta 100 film
2007-09-16 by Stephen Alred
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.