Arthur, I was one of those who posted a negative reaction. The gist of my remarks was that this was totally artless, indeed amateurish, pornography, from a photographic perspective. There have been artists throughout history who have created ³pornographic² works that are valued artistically. Beardsley and Mapplethorpe immediately come to mind. There are legions of others, and from many different cultures. But there is no way that I can ³stretch my definition of [photographic] art¹² to include the work under discussion. I should add, as well, that I hold no special brief against pornography involving freely consenting adults. I grew up with the expression, ³It¹s a free country.² And in spite of present conditions, I still subscribe to that. Harry On 9/27/07 11:31 AM, "Arthur Fink" <af@...> wrote: > I am, quite frankly, more shocked by the strength and quality of the > responses on this list than I was by the rather lurid quality of the > photographs that were presented to us. > > As somebody who has posted very little on this list, I still have > felt that a single notice of a show involving my black and white work > would be tolerated or accepted. (I'd not expect to announce color > shows, which is most of what I'm doing now.) It appears that the > issue is not a lurker trying to post an ad, but something more > related to the content of the images. > > Yes ... the images in question certainly stretch my definition of > "art". But I can easily choose to ignore them, and to look at or > create other images instead. I did notice some nudes that were much > less sexual than the other images. Had those be presented by > themselves, without the sexual/erotic photography text, I doubt that > they would have created any significant stir. > > Back to monitor calibration, step wedges, and Epson's monopolistic > practices. . . > > Arthur Fink > > A r t h u r . F i n k . P h o t o g r a p h y > ------------------------------------------------- > Ten New Island Avenue . land 207.766.5722 > Peaks Island, Maine 04108 . cell 207.615.5722 > www.arthurfinkphoto.com . af@arthurfinkphoto.com > <mailto:af%40arthurfinkphoto.com> -- Harry F. Lockwood [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Shameless self promotion - Cross Posted
2007-09-27 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.