Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re:Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks

2007-10-07 by RobLee

I cant believe how prudent people are in USA. affraid to see naked body, but...

Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen2@...> wrote:                               Echoing Clayton, sign your bloody post Stonieorl99. 
 
 Two, you made a trip all the way to Utah from Florida suggesting that this
 wasn't a quick impulse but rather a well planned trip. Checking with the
 locals is always a good idea. A quick stop at the ranger's office before
 hand or at the very least a call before you left Florida would take of that.
 And while I am all for freedom, I don't think that just getting out of your
 car at the crowded over look dropping your gown and snapping pictures is a
 good thing to do. This may not have been what happened, but if a ranger was
 close by, it suggests tat you were NOT in the back country or that far from
 where families of many diverse beliefs may have been walking or enjoying
 their park. 
 
 Plan ahead and get naked : ) 
 
 Eric
 
 Eric Neilsen Photography
 
 4101 Commerce Street
 
 Suite 9
 
 Dallas, TX 75226
 
 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
 
 http://ericneilsenphotography.com
 
 Skype ejprinter
 
 _____  
 
 From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Clayton
 Price
 Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 10:42 AM
 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
 Cc: stonieorl@...
 Subject: [Digital BW] Re:Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks
 
 Dear,
 
 Your post about shooting in the National Parks is disturbing, to say 
 the least. It's
 become an issue for a number of years now, but the lack of rules 
 which allowed
 the park ranger to make his own value judgement, based perhaps on his 
 personal
 religious or moral code is outrageous.
 
 I strongly suggest, if you haven't already done so, that you contact 
 ASMP, APA, and
 PPof A with this information. They have been steadfast in fighting 
 these types of
 government abuses, which really are values that a few are trying to 
 impose on the many!
 
 And as an aside, it would be nice if you would sign your posts with 
 your name. Nobody
 likes responding to an email nom-de-plume . If this weren't such an 
 important issue,
 I would not have written back.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Clay Price
 
 Posted by: "stonieorl99" stonieorl@aol. <mailto:stonieorl%40aol.com> com
 stonieorl99 wrote:
 A few weeks ago, I was issued a citation in a national park for
 photographing a model without a permit.
 The offense was "failure to obtain permit," 36 CFR 1.6(g)(1);
 the citation did not mention the law or
 regulation that actually required the permit. The citation imposed a
 $150
 fine, and required a mandatory court appearance. I might have
 contested the
 charge, but the court appearance would have been in Salt Lake City,
 Utah,
 and I live in Florida.......
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                               


 Rob 
  
  
 Incoming and outgoing mail scanned by AVG 
 www.grisoft.com
  


       
---------------------------------
Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s user panel and lay it on us.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.