Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks

2007-10-08 by Eric Neilsen

DOI-2007-0035-0001 , "Making Motion Pictures, Television Productions,
Soundtracks or Taking Still Photographs on Certain Areas Under the
Jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior"

 

It seems clear here the intent is to limit the over use and abuse of public
land by footprints much much larger than the individual photographer.
However, in not excluding that type of person from regulation, it also would
include those types of individual that just don't get "it".  Where "it" is
common sense not to stage a reenactment of some major or minor event without
proper OK. 

 

I don't think the intent, and that is a major consideration in enforcement,
would be to limit the well timed execution of a few frames of still
photography that barely impacted the use of the park by others. That
unsigned photographer that had the run in, should be able to resolve this
without additional fees, but was he really unaware? 

 

Perhaps, he also flew on Southwest airlines and wore an in appropriate T
shirt and traveled with a model that wore a scant amount of cloths.    ; )  

 

 

Eric 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street

Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

http://e.neilsen.home.att.net

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

Skype ejprinter

  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gage Hal
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 2:46 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks

 

Jeez, this is buried. Here is the link for searching for the 
document. plugin the document number DOI-2007-0035-0001. Then click 
on the comments link. http://www.regulati
<http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/>
ons.gov/fdmspublic/component/ 
main

Here are my comments for what they're worth.

I am distress at the broad and vague language in the proposal to 
redefine the rules for photographing in National Parks. The use of 
the words model(s), sets(s), or prop(s) without defining any context 
puts all visitors to the National Park System at risk of violation. 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.