Digital BW, The Print

He left a bug-ridden 3rd-world country (Florida) and came to a better

place (Utah), doesn't want to pay for the privilege or play by the rules. 



The Mississippi River needs a fence. 



John/Albuquerque


yeah - the mississippi needs a fence to keep u out of our bread basket. meanwhile, keep your aryian wing-nut comments to yourself. 

----- Original Message ----
From: Robert W. Shearer <rwshearer@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2007 5:29:10 AM
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re:Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks









  


    
            Well said. I was left with the feeling that half a story was being told.



_____  



From: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com

[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of djon43

Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 9:03 PM

To: DigitalBlackandWhit eThePrint@ yahoogroups. com

Subject: [Digital BW] Re:Be Careful Who You Photograph in National Parks



Our mystery spammer seems to me to be blowing smoke. 



He claims the issue was nudity, but his ignoring the detailed

regulations that professional photographers SHOULD know about, and

that HE admits knowing about (though imagines they're invalid).



Fees are commonly charged for commercial photography or films in most

taxpayer-owned tourist destinations (San Francisco and Manhattan and

National Parks have long been well-known for this). 



The fees (and penalties) pay the taxpayers for the commercial use of

their property (the park). I pay taxes, I own a chunk of National

Park, I expect to be paid when somebody shoots pinups on my property.



Our spammer knew that and is pretending the issue was a prudish Park

Ranger, who he undoubtedly argued with, despite his assertion that

he'd been "cooperative. " 



I certainly wouldn't mind nude models near my camp, but our spammer

obviously wobbled describing the situation. Maybe folks wouldn't want

nude models and photographers near their kids camp, especially if the

photographer seemed to be a jerk. 



He left a bug-ridden 3rd-world country (Florida) and came to a better

place (Utah), doesn't want to pay for the privilege or play by the rules. 



The only thing the Ranger MAY have done wrong, if you believe our

spammer, was confiscating equipment... but even that MAY be authorized

, it certainly is for game wardens.



The Mississippi River needs a fence. 



John/Albuquerque



-- In DigitalBlackandWhit

<mailto:DigitalBlac kandWhiteThePrin t%40yahoogroups. com>

eThePrint@yahoogrou ps.com, "Stephen Billard"

<stephen@... > wrote:

>

> Well, I suppose it could be dangerous to view a naked body. Or did

you mean

> prudish? 

> 

> 

> - Stephen

> stephen.sbillard. org

> 

> -----Original Message-----

> From: DigitalBlackandWhit

<mailto:DigitalBlac kandWhiteThePrin t%40yahoogroups. com>

eThePrint@yahoogrou ps.com

> [mailto:DigitalBlac kandWhit

<mailto:DigitalBlac kandWhiteThePrin t%40yahoogroups. com>

eThePrint@yahoogrou ps.com] On Behalf Of

RobLee

> Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:26 PM

> To: DigitalBlackandWhit

<mailto:DigitalBlac kandWhiteThePrin t%40yahoogroups. com>

eThePrint@yahoogrou ps.com

> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Re:Be Careful Who You Photograph in

National Parks

> 

> I cant believe how prudent people are in USA. affraid to see naked body,

> but...

> 

> Eric Neilsen <e.neilsen2@ ...> wrote:

> Echoing Clayton, sign your bloody post Stonieorl99.

>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





    
  

    
    




<!--