Sarah, I¹m also planning on going the K7 route for my R2400 What machine are you using? And are you using a CIS setup or refillable carts? Harry On 10/17/07 1:16 PM, "Sarah Thompson" <sarah@...> wrote: > > john kelly wrote: >> > What's the logic behind K7 Vs OEM? >> > >> > At the end of the day are wonderful results expected >> > in exchange for the reported grief and wasted time? >> > >> > > In my case, yes, I've made the best B&W prints with K7 that I've ever > made. I got close with the OEM inks, but there was always *something* > not quite as good as I wanted it to be. With K7 and its associated > colour management flow, reprinting my old images was easy and gave me > the best prints I'd ever made from them. > > So sorry, yes, I think the carts are a bit out of spec physically so the > chips sometimes don't quite line up properly, which is a pain, but once > it works, it *really* works. I always had difficulty with colour > balance, illuminant metamerism basically, when I was using ABW, so I'd > do a print that looked great, but once it was framed with white mat > board it looked a bit blue, or green, or something. Just not quite > right, and however much fiddling about I did I couldn't quite fix it. > But K7 (I use the split tone version) gave me exactly what I liked > without any effort at all, no metamerism at all. I've also been > extremely impressed with the resolution I get with the K7/QTR flow, > definitely noticeable better than the ABW route. My images are mostly > either from a Better Light scan back (8000x6000) or a Megavision > monochrome medium format back (4000x4000), so being able to see that > resolution in smaller prints (which never quite worked with ABW) is > pretty awesome in my opinion. -- Harry F. Lockwood [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: R2400 & Piezography problem
2007-10-17 by Harry Lockwood
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.