On Nov 14, 2007 7:13 AM, john kelly <djon43@...> wrote: > Asking the European Union to lower the bar to > accommodate inferior "competitors" and to punish > Epson/Canon/HP for excellence and innovation is the > old-time bureaucratic thinking that contributed to the > collapse of the Soviet Union. Nothing like the spectre of communism to prove you are right. > Why the concern about Chinese-manufactured plastic > products? Ink's more important. > Since we can't just pour ink in the printer, the plastic product you mention is inseparable part of the equation. > Wouldn't it be better to ask consumer watchdog > agencies to punish companies that distribute > printer-damaging, clogging inks, and cartridges that > commonly fail, and CIS systems that damage print > heads, than to to penalize companies that make good > products? > Sounds good. Does this by definition automatically include Canon/Epson/HP/Lexmark and exclude everyone else? Perhaps we should just invade China? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re:Printer OEM's - EU anti-competitive practices investigation
2007-11-14 by Marko Milisavljevic
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.