Digital BW, The Print

Richards,
Thank you for your suggestion - as if it weren't obvious.  But it does miss
my point.  In my two posts I referred to prints being touched as not always
being under my control:

"I know the simple way to avoid fingerprints on prints is 'don't touch the
print'.  But it's not easy and of course it's not always under your
control."
and
"Back to my original point - it's not always possible stop someone (a
potential customer for example) from touching a print." 

It may well look good, even superb, but if it's so easy to mark then the
real question here is "is the paper up to the job".  OK - it depends on the
job.  If everything is under your control for the life of the print (cotton
gloves and all) then fine.
 
Steve Gledhill
www.virtuallygrey.co.uk


  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
CorrPro96@...
Sent: 09 December 2007 19:38
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re:Fingerprints

In a message dated 12/9/2007 2:21:19 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
 <mailto:richeskinphoto%40comcast.net> richeskinphoto@... writes:

Have you ever tried inexpensive cotton gloves?

Richard Eskin

Hell... you let the secret out.

Richard Massie



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]