> Solux lamps and I think the consensus is that the 4100K one > is a better compromise for exhibition lighting > compatibility. There's still a lot of composite grey in the > prints with the color managed workflow that will give > metamerism between daylight and tungsten. Can you compare > the prints to earlier versions and see whether they behave > differently ? > > I there a shift in ICC profile version compatibility between > the OS X's ? > > > ABW should give a better Dmax than through the color > workflow, at least I see that with the similar B&W mode of > the HP driver. However in the Epson ABW there's color ink > left in the B&W print too, partly to compensate the warmer K > inks. You could use ABW with a QTR created profile to get > shadow detail back. > That's a good question about ICC profile version compatibility - I never thought of that. I guess the metamerism would explain the blue/green cast when viewed in a room predominantly illuminated by daylight. Seems I should invest in a Solux lamp. However, this still leaves the problem of ABW prints being much darker than what I see onscreen. Hmmm...
Message
Re: ABW vs. color-managed workflow for B&W prints
2007-12-18 by chriskjezp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.