Paul, she apparently wanted "good" more than "cheap" (she spoke of 3800, not Ebay) and evidently didn't want to restrict herself to tiny (letter-sized) prints. I love my digital setup (2200, Nikon V, Vuescan, CS2, QTR, OEM ..I get perfect neutral prints, refraining from yellow pigment, using OEM pigments. I'm not replacing 2200 with anything new for a while because I've seen a lot of 2400, black only, 3800, 1800 etc and know that the 2200 readily equals them visually (quants will disagree, photographers won't). Visit to Freestylephoto.biz to confirm the relative prices of VERY high quality silver paper and typical-high-quality inkjet paper (compare to your favorite cheapest inkjet vendor as well). The cost of a darkroom is almost zero if one already has the equipment (as she may, and many of us do). Darkroom equipment costs little more than zero if one buys used equipment in one's community at today's prices. A good small/medium enlarger with superb lenses is far cheaper than an inkjet printer that's likely to serve for more than a year (ie 2400 rather than lesser Epsons)... and it probably comes with trays, safelights, tongs, timers, paper, chemicals, and warm handshakes. Darkroom construction costs virtually nothing unless one needs luxurious digs. I've worked from hall closets, bathrooms, garages...as most of us who were photographers before inkjet became credible. Focusing primarily on "holding down costs" one MAY save money with inkjet...until/unless the printer fails when they clog it, ultimately being discarded (1 year with Epson's cheapies?)... assuming they use the cheapest paper. IMO the best reasons for inkjet are the controls. Darkrooms deliver their own visual and procedural advantages, including other controls. Some of us print digitally for "cheapness," others do it for "control." I think digital is a LOT more expensive than darkroom if one uses the better inkjet papers. Ink savings can sometimes be a way of destroying printers, as we see so often on this Forum, and they're usually a way to expend extra time...which is OK if time isn't money.
Message
Re: Help....
2007-12-22 by john kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.