--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "djon43" <djon43@...> wrote: > > Our ancestors' prints lasted nicely for 50 years without much care, > and remarkably well in many cases for 100-plus without "archival" > crossing anybody's lips. > > Average-good prints from 1890 can be scanned and printed beautifully > today...sometimes looking better than new...I say that on the basis of > lots of my own family's images and many that have come to my > collection ranging from 60 to 100 years (eg from Austria, Russia, and > China) Those of course are the ones which survived - plenty haven't. I've seen hundreds of old prints and negatives brought in to photo archives which are basically only good for the garbage.
Message
Re: Sense about "archival"
2008-01-03 by Tim Atherton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.