Actually, my bad....you are right. Hmm......now I need to see what the difference is. Honestly, I've had great results scanning this way since I got the printer, about 2 years ago.... AnnMarie www.annmarietornabene.net On Jan 3, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Mark Savoia wrote: > Hate to burst your bubble but I looked it up quickly and it is 4800, > so if you are scanning at anything higher then that you are > interpolating. > > Mark > http://www.stillrivereditions.com > > On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:58 AM, AnnMarie Tornabene wrote: > > > Yes, Mark, I believe it is...I'm not a fan of interpolation... > > > > AnnMarie > > www.annmarietornabene.net > > > > > > > > On Jan 3, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Mark Savoia wrote: > > > >> Is that the optical resolution of that scanner? > >> > >> Mark > >> http://www.stillrivereditions.com > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners being used
2008-01-03 by AnnMarie Tornabene
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.