I have a 4990 and did a resolution test using a 35mm Tech Pan negative of the USAF resolution target. My scanner hit peak resolution at 4800 dpi - could read 55 line pairs/millimeter (lp/mm) off the scan of the USAF test target negative. I got 50 lp/mm at 3200 dpi and progressively lower lp/mm at lower dpi settings. The higher extrapolated dpi settings (>4800) of the 4990 did not give greater lp/mm resolution values. I think lp/mm is a more realistic metric for scanner resolution than dpi. I routinely scan 120 negs at 4800 dpi and 4x5 at 3200 dpi for files of ~250mB and ~500 mB respectively. Files larger than ~500mB really start to choke my PC with 3 gigs of RAM and CS2 when working on the images. I don't care how long the scan takes or how much disk space is occupied - I'm trying to wring the most quality out of my scans I can with the equipment I have. FWIW, TK [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Scanners being used
2008-01-05 by TK Thompson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.