Hello Robert, would you share the QTR curves you use for 3MK and 4MK with the R220? I would like to try them on my R2400 which has twice the nozzles as the R220. Thank you very much. Daniela --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "robert49brake" <robert49brake@...> wrote: > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Sarah Renkes" <sagaface@> > wrote: > > > > Does the paper still show through with this method like the original BO? > > > > Hello Sarah, Yes it does. I have a new 1800 I'll be setting up for 3k printing and am > looking forward to it. As a test before hand I set up a 220 with 3mk, 4mk and then 4pkn > just to get an idea of what it could do. I was very impressed with the 3/4 mk prints (on > PAHP205). There was a luminosity I'd not seen on matte papers before. Images where > local contrast is important seem to do particularly well with this approach. > > The only real difference between 3 and 1 BO seems to be that the dot placement patterns > are different, smoothing out banding and so forth, the amount of ink getting on to the > paper seems the same. > > With the r220 there is a significant difference in a matte print between 3/4 MK and the > UT3D that I also use. Not better or worse but distinctly different. (and a difference I like > depending on the print) I am curious as to whether or not that difference will be as > pronounced on the 1800 with its smaller drops. > > Robert >
Message
Re: BO-3 question...
2008-01-10 by dgattarino
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.