definitively. Thanks! Gabriel --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Louis Dina" <lou@...> wrote: > > Frank, > > Dmax is measured with a densitometer or a spectrophotometer. Glossy > and luster papers have a higher Dmax, and matter papers have a lower > Dmax. Some of that is due to the fact that glossy papers tend to > reflect back like a mirror, whereas matte papers scatter the light so > less reflects back to reach the measuring device. > > Even though the Dmax of a matte paper may be lower, it may "appear" a > lot darker than it is. This is particularly true when framed and set > behind glass. For matte papers, a Dmax higher than 1.6 is usually > good enough for a solid black look, but I prefer to get closer to 1.7 > if possible. When you get below 1.6, blacks can start to look a > little weak. > > Every paper its own potential Dmax, but this is based not only on the > paper, but the inkset used. And even then, you need to get the > right amount of ink on the paper. Too little ink will generally > result in lower Dmax, but too much can also cause fogging, pooling, > bleeding, and may actually cause the Dmax to drop too. So, you need > to get the ink limit set about right for the best blacks. The dither > pattern also has an influence. Ideally, you want no white flecks > visible under a loupe, and you want just enough ink to give you the > best Dmax, but no more. > > For color profiles, there are also other considerations, and it is > often a trade-off. Sometimes the highest Dmax can reduce the color > gamut a little, and sometimes maximum color gamut may slightly reduce > Dmax. Sometimes, you are lucky enough to get both. > > Like most people, I test each paper using a specific printer and > inkset to find the best overall compromise. For B&W, color gamut is > a non-issue, so you can shoot for Dmax without worrying about > lessening the color gamut slightly. With QTR, you print a 21 step > grayscale and find the step that gives you the very best black you > can get. It can be done by eye, but a densitometer or spectro is a > better way to nail the best settings. > > I have some matte papers that measure a fairly low Dmax (around 1.6) > but they look fantastic when printed. I'd like a higher Dmax, but in > the final analysis, we are after a print that looks great and shows a > wide, smooth range of tones. Surface texture, how the ink lays on > the print, and other factors come into play. Dmax is one guide to > help us in the quest for better prints, but can't be taken as the > only measure, IMO. > > Hope that sheds a little light on the subject. > > Lou > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Frank Jay > <frankjay02@> wrote: > > > > > Any help or comment that will give me a better understanding of > Dmax, be it measured or perceptual will be appreciated. > > thanks > > Frank >
Message
Re: Dmax question
2008-01-11 by gvalansi
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.