I also made the switch to Vista 64 recently (last week, and running SP1 pre-release). The advantage is largely around memory available to applications. Each 32-bit application can access up to a full 4GB on a 64-bit OS, so 64-bit versions of common apps are not really necessary (yet) unless you are manipulating extremely large images. With 32-bit OSes (Vista 32 or XP), you are limited to a total of less than 3.3GB no matter how much memory you put in your system. If you have a 512MB Video Card, it's not unusual to be down around 2.7GB. The OS will then try to use a big chunk of that for caching and all the rest is shared by applications. Now, several GB may sound like a lot, and for most apps it is, but PhotoShop and Lightroom like "contiguous" physical memory (I believe this is related to how they use the video card). With a 64-bit OS there is a much better chance that they will get what they ask for. I saw memory problems with printing in particular, so I'm hoping that with 6GB - all available - this will be less of an issue. I'll keep my fingers crossed. The additional memory (Corsair XMS) cost me <$20/GB from newegg. I have drivers for all of my hardware. Even my Huey works (1.0.5), Wacom Graphire, etc. Some older devices may not work, particularly printers and webcams as the effort to get them working on Vista (any flavor) is a lot harder anyway. One (only?) app that gave me trouble was PS Elements 4.0. It worked fine when I had only 2GB in my Vista 64 system. When I went to 6GB, it got weird. The organizer window (all I use) was just not visible on screen. No idea where it went. I downloaded a trial of PSE 6.0 and that works fine for me - and it uses ACR 4.x. (I'm kicking myself because Costco had it on sale for $49 until Saturday and I didn't find out about the problem until Sunday night.) BTW, my setup is 2x500GB SATA RAID1 for the OS, 2 partitions (dual boot Vista 32 & 64), 2x320GB SATA RAID0 for my data and scratch space, 500GB USB drive for backup. I duplicate my pictures in many ways because that's what really matters :). I have had drive failures so RAID1 is very useful to avoid a full OS reinstall. And I have use Vista's full system backup to restore the entire OS to new drives/partitions (unplug your data disks and deactivate any Adobe products FIRST!). If you use the same physical drives for scratch as the OS, you may get into performance issues if the OS starts to page but as noted, this should be minimal in a setup like this. One word of caution - if you are installing Vista (not SP1), do so with less than 4GB to start.
Message
Re: Scratch Disk
2008-01-31 by goldner_jeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.